Skip to main content
Thank you for contributing to Lyzr’s open-source projects. This guide covers the development setup, contribution workflow, and standards for Control Plane, GitAgent, and OpenGAP.

Which repo?

ProjectRepository
GitAgentopen-gitagent/gitagent
OpenGAPopen-gitagent/opengap

Before you start

  • Search existing issues before opening a new one.
  • For significant changes, open an issue first to discuss the approach before writing code; this saves everyone time.
  • Small fixes (typos, broken links, documentation) can go straight to a PR.

Development setup

Control Plane

git clone https://github.com/LyzrCore/langship
cd langship
npm install
cp .env.example .env        # add your LLM API key
npm run dev                 # start development server
npm test                    # run tests

GitAgent

For contribution guidelines, setup instructions, and coding standards, refer to the GitAgent Contributing Guide.

OpenGAP

For contribution guidelines, setup instructions, and coding standards, refer to the OpenGAP Contributing Guide.

Branch naming

feat/short-description      # new feature
fix/short-description       # bug fix
docs/short-description      # documentation only
chore/short-description     # tooling, deps, config
Examples: feat/canary-deployment, fix/otel-span-missing, docs/sdk-reference

Commit messages

Follow Conventional Commits:
feat: add canary deployment strategy
fix: resolve missing OTEL span on session end
docs: add SDK reference page
chore: upgrade typescript to 5.4
Breaking changes: add ! after the type and include BREAKING CHANGE: in the commit body.

Pull request checklist

Before submitting a PR, confirm:
  • Tests pass locally (npm test or pytest)
  • New functionality has tests
  • Documentation updated (if the change affects user-facing behavior)
  • CHANGELOG.md entry added under [Unreleased]
  • No secrets, API keys, or credentials in the diff
  • PR description explains why the change is needed, not just what it does

What gets merged

We merge PRs that:
  • Fix a confirmed bug
  • Add a feature discussed and approved in an issue
  • Improve documentation meaningfully
  • Add test coverage for untested paths
We close PRs that:
  • Add features without prior discussion
  • Introduce new dependencies without clear justification
  • Change behavior without tests
  • Duplicate existing functionality

Review timeline

Maintainers aim to review PRs within 5 business days. If you haven’t heard back in a week, leave a comment on the PR.

Good first issues

New contributor? Look for issues labeled good first issue. These are scoped to be completable without deep codebase knowledge and have clear acceptance criteria.

Getting help

Stuck on something contribution-related? Ask in #open-source on Discord or leave a comment on the relevant GitHub issue.